AWS for Data Engineer (PySpark) Mastery Course

Now we enter the architect’s battlefield.
This is where you stop being a Spark developer and become a true AWS Data Architect.

We will not draw toy diagrams.

We will design real-world, production-grade, petabyte-scale systems like Netflix, Uber, Amazon, and Flipkart.

We will think in terms of:

  • latency
  • throughput
  • cost
  • fault tolerance
  • scalability
  • data governance
  • security
  • operability
  • evolution over time

This module will permanently change how you design data systems.


🧠 MODULE 1.5 — AWS DATA ENGINEERING SYSTEM DESIGN (HARDCORE MODE)

We will build 5 real architectures:

  1. Modern Batch Data Platform (Petabyte scale)
  2. Real-time Streaming Analytics System
  3. Lakehouse Architecture on AWS
  4. Hybrid Batch + Streaming (Lambda/Kappa architecture)
  5. Interview-grade System Design Framework

And we will analyze:

  • why each component exists
  • what breaks at scale
  • how AWS networking + storage + Spark interact
  • how to optimize cost and performance
  • what interviewers REALLY want

1️⃣ How Architects Think (Not Developers)

Developers think:

“Which service should I use?”

Architects think:

“What are my constraints?”

Core Constraints in Data Engineering

  1. Data volume (GB → TB → PB)
  2. Velocity (batch vs streaming)
  3. Variety (structured, semi, unstructured)
  4. Latency requirements (ms vs hours)
  5. Cost constraints
  6. Reliability (SLA)
  7. Security & compliance
  8. Future evolution

2️⃣ Architecture 1 — Modern Batch Data Platform (Petabyte Scale)

🎯 Use Case

  • Company collects logs, transactions, IoT data.
  • Volume: 50 TB/day.
  • Users: analysts, ML teams, dashboards.

🏗️ Architecture

Sources
 (Apps, DBs, APIs)
        ↓
Ingestion Layer
 (Kafka / Kinesis / DMS / SFTP)
        ↓
Raw Storage (Bronze)
 (S3 - JSON/Avro)
        ↓
Processing Layer
 (EMR / Glue / Spark)
        ↓
Curated Storage (Silver/Gold)
 (S3 - Parquet/Delta)
        ↓
Analytics Layer
 (Athena / Redshift / BI Tools)
        ↓
Orchestration
 (Airflow / Step Functions)

🧠 Why Each Component Exists?

1. Ingestion Layer

Why Kafka/Kinesis?

Because:

  • decouple producers from consumers
  • handle spikes
  • replay data

2. Raw Storage (S3 Bronze)

Why S3?

Because:

  • infinite scalability
  • cheap
  • durable
  • decouples compute from storage

Why JSON/Avro?

Because:

  • schema evolution
  • raw data preservation

3. Processing Layer (Spark on EMR/Glue)

Why Spark?

Because:

  • distributed processing
  • handles TB–PB data

Why EMR vs Glue?

ScenarioChoice
Heavy workloadsEMR
Simple ETLGlue

4. Curated Storage (Parquet/Delta)

Why Parquet?

Because:

  • columnar
  • compressed
  • Spark-friendly

Why Delta/Iceberg?

Because:

  • ACID transactions
  • time travel
  • schema evolution

5. Analytics Layer

Athena:

  • ad-hoc SQL
  • cheap
  • S3-based

Redshift:

  • high-performance analytics
  • structured queries

6. Orchestration

Why Airflow?

Because:

  • dependency management
  • retries
  • scheduling

💣 What breaks at scale?

Problem 1 — Small files explosion

Raw data arrives every second → millions of files.

Impact:

  • Spark slow
  • Athena slow
  • Glue slow

Solution:

  • compaction jobs
  • micro-batch ingestion
  • partition strategy

Problem 2 — NAT Gateway bottleneck

EMR cluster reads S3 via NAT.

Impact:

  • network throttling
  • high cost

Solution:

  • S3 VPC endpoint

Problem 3 — Spark driver overload

Too many partitions → driver OOM.

Solution:

  • partition tuning
  • file compaction

Problem 4 — Data skew

Some keys dominate data.

Solution:

  • salting, AQE, broadcast join

3️⃣ Architecture 2 — Real-Time Streaming Analytics (Uber-like)

🎯 Use Case

  • Real-time user events.
  • Latency: < 1 second.
  • Volume: millions of events/sec.

🏗️ Architecture

Producers
 (Mobile Apps, IoT)
        ↓
Streaming Layer
 (Kafka / Kinesis)
        ↓
Stream Processing
 (Spark Streaming / Flink)
        ↓
Serving Layer
 (DynamoDB / Redis / OpenSearch)
        ↓
Long-term Storage
 (S3 Data Lake)
        ↓
Analytics
 (Redshift / Athena)

🧠 Key Design Decisions

Why Kafka/Kinesis?

Because:

  • high throughput
  • partitioned logs
  • replay capability

Why Spark Streaming?

Because:

  • micro-batch processing
  • integration with batch Spark

Alternative:

  • Flink for low latency

Why DynamoDB?

Because:

  • low-latency reads
  • scalable key-value store

Why S3?

Because:

  • historical data analysis.

💣 Failure Scenarios

Scenario 1 — Kafka partition imbalance

Some partitions overloaded.

Impact:

  • lag increases
  • Spark streaming slow

Solution:

  • re-partition topics
  • key design

Scenario 2 — Backpressure

Spark cannot process data fast enough.

Solution:

  • autoscaling executors
  • batch interval tuning

Scenario 3 — Exactly-once semantics

Problem:

  • duplicate events.

Solution:

  • idempotent writes
  • checkpointing

4️⃣ Architecture 3 — Lakehouse on AWS (Modern Enterprise)

🎯 Use Case

  • Unified analytics + ML platform.
  • Petabyte-scale data lake.
  • ACID transactions.

🏗️ Architecture

Sources → Kafka/Kinesis → S3 (Delta/Iceberg)
                         ↓
                    Spark / EMR / Glue
                         ↓
                   BI / ML / APIs

🧠 Why Lakehouse?

Because traditional data lakes lack:

  • ACID transactions
  • schema enforcement
  • governance

Delta/Iceberg/Hudi solve this.


💣 Real-world issues

Issue 1 — Metadata explosion

Millions of partitions.

Solution:

  • partition pruning
  • manifest optimization

Issue 2 — Concurrent writes

Multiple Spark jobs writing same table.

Solution:

  • Delta transaction logs.

5️⃣ Architecture 4 — Lambda vs Kappa Architecture

Lambda Architecture

Batch + Streaming.

Pros:

  • accurate batch results
  • real-time insights

Cons:

  • complexity

Kappa Architecture

Only streaming.

Pros:

  • simpler
  • unified pipeline

Cons:

  • complex reprocessing

6️⃣ Interview-Grade System Design Framework

When interviewer asks:

“Design a data platform on AWS.”

Most candidates fail because they jump to services.

Instead follow this structure:


Step 1 — Clarify Requirements

Ask:

  • Data volume?
  • Latency?
  • Users?
  • Cost?
  • SLA?

Step 2 — Define Layers

  1. Ingestion
  2. Storage
  3. Processing
  4. Serving
  5. Orchestration
  6. Governance

Step 3 — Choose AWS Services

Explain WHY, not WHAT.

Example:

“I choose S3 because decoupling compute and storage is critical for scalability.”


Step 4 — Identify Bottlenecks

Talk about:

  • small files
  • skew
  • network
  • cost
  • scaling

This is where you sound senior.


Step 5 — Propose Optimizations

Mention:

  • partitioning
  • caching
  • autoscaling
  • compression
  • governance

🧠 Ultra-Deep Insight (Architect-Level)

Most people design pipelines like:

S3 → Spark → Redshift.

Architects design pipelines like:

Network + Storage + Compute + Cost + Failure model + Evolution.


🎯 PhD-Level Interview Questions (with hidden traps)

Try thinking deeply.


Q1

Design a system to process 100 TB/day logs on AWS.

What would you choose and why?


Q2

How would you design a real-time fraud detection system?


Q3

Why not use Redshift instead of S3 + Spark?


Q4

How would you reduce AWS cost of Spark jobs by 50%?


Q5

How would you redesign a failing data lake?


If you want, I will:

✅ Answer these questions like a top AWS architect
✅ Create a complete AWS Data Engineer Interview Playbook
✅ Build a step-by-step hands-on roadmap with labs + datasets + PySpark + AWS
✅ Create a PhD-level cheat sheet + mind maps + diagrams
✅ Design a 30–60 day mastery plan for you

If you say:

👉 “Build the AWS Data Engineer Master Playbook (Interview + Practice + Labs)”

I will turn this knowledge into a structured system you can actually study and master.