Perfect — I’ll build a true PySpark & Spark Mastery Course (A→Z, PhD-level) designed for:
- ✅ Deep conceptual understanding (Spark internals)
- ✅ Real-world coding mastery (PySpark, Spark SQL, RDDs)
- ✅ Performance engineering & memory tuning
- ✅ Debugging & error handling
- ✅ Interview dominance (tricky + traps + LeetCode-style)
- ✅ Live datasets & realistic examples
- ✅ Data engineering + backend + distributed systems perspective
This is not a syllabus — it’s a complete learning system + practice framework + interview weapon.
🧠 Spark & PySpark Mastery Course (A→Z, Hardcore)
🧩 COURSE DNA (What makes this different)
This course covers 6 layers:
- Distributed Systems Foundations
- Spark Core Architecture
- PySpark & Spark SQL Mastery
- Memory & Performance Engineering
- Production-Grade Spark
- Interview + Research-Level Understanding
By the end, you’ll think like a Spark engineer, not just a user.
🧱 PHASE 0 — Distributed Systems Foundation (Mandatory)
Spark cannot be mastered without distributed systems thinking.
0.1 Core Concepts
- Parallelism vs Concurrency
- Horizontal vs Vertical Scaling
- Shared-nothing architecture
- CAP theorem
- Data locality
- Fault tolerance
- Consensus (ZooKeeper, Raft)
- MapReduce vs Spark
0.2 Cluster Architecture
- Master–Worker model
- Resource managers:
- YARN
- Kubernetes
- Standalone
- Mesos
- Node types:
- Driver
- Executor
- Worker
- Master
0.3 Data Partitioning Theory
- Hash partitioning
- Range partitioning
- Custom partitioners
- Skewed data problem
⚙️ PHASE 1 — Spark Core Architecture (Deep Internals)
1.1 What Spark Really Is
Spark = DAG-based distributed computation engine.
Spark Components
Spark Application
├── Driver Program
├── SparkContext
├── Cluster Manager
├── Executors
├── Tasks
└── DAG Scheduler
1.2 Spark Execution Flow (REAL)
🔥 Interview-critical topic.
Step-by-step Execution
- User writes code (PySpark)
- Driver parses code → builds logical plan
- DAG Scheduler creates DAG
- Stages are created
- Tasks are created
- Tasks sent to executors
- Executors run tasks
- Results returned to driver
Visual Execution Model
Code → Logical Plan → DAG → Stages → Tasks → Executors → Output
1.3 DAG vs Stage vs Task
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| DAG | Graph of transformations |
| Stage | Group of tasks separated by shuffle |
| Task | Unit of work per partition |
Example
rdd = sc.textFile("data.txt") \
.map(lambda x: x.split(",")) \
.filter(lambda x: int(x[1]) > 50) \
.groupByKey() \
.collect()
👉 groupByKey() creates a shuffle → new stage.
🧬 PHASE 2 — RDD Mastery (Hardcore)
2.1 RDD Types
- Parallelized Collections
- Hadoop RDDs
- Pair RDDs
- Cached RDDs
- Broadcast RDDs
2.2 RDD Transformations vs Actions
Transformations (Lazy)
- map, flatMap, filter
- union, intersection
- reduceByKey, groupByKey
- join, cogroup
- repartition, coalesce
Actions (Eager)
- collect, count, take
- reduce, foreach
- saveAsTextFile
2.3 Lazy Evaluation (Deep Truth)
Spark does NOT execute until an action is called.
Interview Trap
❓ Why does Spark use lazy evaluation?
✅ Answer:
- Optimization
- DAG optimization
- Fault tolerance
- Pipeline execution
2.4 RDD Lineage & Fault Tolerance
Lineage Graph
HDFS → map → filter → reduce → output
If a partition fails → Spark recomputes it.
🔥 Interview Question:
❓ Why doesn’t Spark replicate RDDs like HDFS?
✅ Because lineage is cheaper than replication.
2.5 Narrow vs Wide Transformations
| Type | Example | Shuffle? |
|---|---|---|
| Narrow | map, filter | ❌ No |
| Wide | groupByKey, join | ✅ Yes |
Performance Insight
Wide transformations = expensive.
🧪 LIVE DATASET (Used Throughout Course)
We will use realistic datasets.
Dataset 1: Users
users = [
(1,"Amit","India",28,50000),
(2,"Rahul","India",35,80000),
(3,"John","USA",40,120000),
(4,"Sara","USA",29,70000),
(5,"Li","China",32,90000),
(6,"Arjun","India",28,50000),
(7,"Amit","India",28,50000) # duplicate
]
Schema:
(user_id, name, country, age, salary)
Dataset 2: Transactions
transactions = [
(1,1000,"2025-01-01"),
(1,2000,"2025-01-02"),
(2,500,"2025-01-03"),
(3,7000,"2025-01-04"),
(3,3000,"2025-01-05"),
(5,4000,"2025-01-06"),
]
Schema:
(user_id, amount, date)
We’ll use these to explain joins, shuffles, skew, caching, etc.
🧠 PHASE 3 — DataFrame & Spark SQL (Internals + Practice)
3.1 DataFrame vs RDD vs Dataset
| Feature | RDD | DataFrame |
|---|---|---|
| Type safety | ❌ | ❌ (Python) |
| Optimization | ❌ | ✅ Catalyst |
| Performance | ⚠️ | 🚀 |
| API Level | Low | High |
3.2 Catalyst Optimizer (PhD-level)
Spark SQL Execution Pipeline:
SQL Query
→ Logical Plan
→ Optimized Logical Plan (Catalyst)
→ Physical Plan
→ Tungsten Execution
Catalyst Optimizations
- Predicate pushdown
- Constant folding
- Column pruning
- Join reordering
- Subquery elimination
🔥 Interview Trap:
❓ Why is DataFrame faster than RDD?
✅ Because of Catalyst + Tungsten + JVM bytecode optimization.
3.3 Tungsten Engine
Optimizations:
- Off-heap memory
- Code generation
- Binary row format
- Whole-stage code generation
🧠 PHASE 4 — Memory Management (Most Ignored but Most Important)
4.1 Spark Memory Model
Executor Memory Split:
Executor Memory
├── Storage Memory (cache)
├── Execution Memory (shuffle, joins)
├── User Memory
└── Reserved Memory
Default Split
| Type | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Execution | 60% |
| Storage | 40% |
(inside unified memory)
4.2 JVM Memory in Spark
Heap Memory
├── Young Gen
├── Old Gen
└── Metaspace
GC types:
- G1GC
- CMS
- Parallel GC
- ZGC
🔥 Interview Question:
❓ Why does Spark job fail with OOM even if executor memory is high?
✅ Because:
- Shuffle spill
- Skewed partitions
- GC overhead
- Off-heap memory
- Driver memory overflow
4.3 Memory Tuning Parameters
Important configs:
--executor-memory 8g
--driver-memory 4g
--executor-cores 4
--num-executors 10
spark.sql.shuffle.partitions=200
spark.memory.fraction=0.6
spark.memory.storageFraction=0.5
⚡ PHASE 5 — Performance Optimization (Real Engineering)
5.1 Shuffle Optimization
Bad:
df.groupBy("country").count()
Better:
- Use reduceByKey instead of groupByKey
- Use broadcast join
- Repartition wisely
5.2 Join Optimization
Join types:
| Join | Shuffle? |
|---|---|
| Broadcast Join | ❌ |
| Sort Merge Join | ✅ |
| Shuffle Hash Join | ✅ |
| Cartesian Join | 💀 |
Broadcast Join Example
from pyspark.sql.functions import broadcast
df.join(broadcast(dim_df), "user_id")
🔥 Interview Trap:
❓ When should you NOT use broadcast join?
✅ When dimension table is large → driver OOM.
5.3 Data Skew Handling
Techniques:
- Salting
- AQE (Adaptive Query Execution)
- Skew join hints
- Custom partitioning
5.4 Partitioning Strategy
Golden rule:
Partitions ≈ 2–4 × total CPU cores
🧨 PHASE 6 — Error Handling & Debugging (Production Level)
Common Spark Errors
1. OutOfMemoryError
Causes:
- Large collect()
- Skewed joins
- Too few partitions
Fix:
- Increase partitions
- Avoid collect()
- Use broadcast carefully
2. Shuffle Fetch Failed
Cause:
- Executor lost
- Network issue
- Disk spill
Fix:
- Increase executor memory
- Enable external shuffle service
3. Stage Failure
Cause:
- Bad UDF
- Null pointer
- Serialization error
4. Serialization Errors
Pickle vs Kryo:
spark.serializer=org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoSerializer
🎯 PHASE 7 — PySpark Coding Mastery (Hardcore)
Example 1: Top N salary by country
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
from pyspark.sql.functions import dense_rank, col
w = Window.partitionBy("country").orderBy(col("salary").desc())
df.withColumn("rank", dense_rank().over(w)).filter("rank <= 2")
Example 2: Detect duplicates
df.groupBy(df.columns).count().filter("count > 1")
Example 3: LeetCode-style Spark Problem
Problem: Second highest salary per country
Solution:
from pyspark.sql.functions import dense_rank
w = Window.partitionBy("country").orderBy(col("salary").desc())
df.withColumn("r", dense_rank().over(w)).filter("r = 2")
🧠 PHASE 8 — Interview Mastery (Elite Level)
🔥 Top Tricky Spark Questions
Q1
❓ Difference between repartition and coalesce?
✅ Answer:
- repartition → shuffle, increase/decrease partitions
- coalesce → no shuffle, only decrease partitions
Q2
❓ Why is groupByKey slower than reduceByKey?
✅ Because groupByKey shuffles entire data.
Q3
❓ Difference between cache() and persist()?
✅ cache() = MEMORY_ONLY
persist() = custom storage level.
Q4 (Trap)
❓ Spark is faster than Hadoop. True or false?
✅ False.
Spark is faster for iterative workloads, not always.
🧠 PHASE 9 — PhD-Level Spark Topics
- Spark AQE internals
- Cost-based optimizer
- Vectorized execution
- Columnar storage (Parquet, ORC)
- Delta Lake internals
- Spark on Kubernetes
- Spark streaming internals
- State store & watermarking
- Shuffle service architecture
- Spark vs Flink vs Dask
- Query plan analysis
- Spark source code walkthrough
🧩 PHASE 10 — Real Projects (Industry-Level)
Projects you will build:
- Distributed log analytics engine
- Data warehouse using Spark + Delta
- Fraud detection pipeline
- Recommendation engine
- Real-time streaming pipeline
- Spark performance benchmarking tool
- Custom Spark optimizer tool
🧠 If you want, I can now:
✅ Turn this into a structured day-by-day course (like your Flask/FastAPI course)
✅ Expand each phase into deep chapters with diagrams + live data + exercises
✅ Create 500+ Spark interview questions + solutions
✅ Build Spark LeetCode problem bank
✅ Create printable Spark Bible (PDF-level)
✅ Teach Spark like a PhD thesis (with proofs + internals)
If you want, I’ll start with:
👉 Module 1: Spark Architecture — Deepest Possible Explanation (with diagrams + live execution simulation)
This will be 🔥 insane level.